MARTIN

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Harrison Porterfield v. State, 522 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …0 U.S. 1055, 103 S.Ct. 1506, 75 L.Ed.2d 935 (1983); Redfield v. United States, 315 F. 2d 76 (9th Cir.1963); United States ex rel. Miller v. Follette, 278 F.Supp. 1003 (E.D.N. Y.), aff'd, 397 F. 2d 363 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, Miller v. Follette, 393 U.S. 1039, 89 S.Ct. 660, 21 L.Ed.2d 585 (1969); Jones v. State, 381 So. 2d 983 (Miss.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1003, 101 S.Ct. 543, 66 L.Ed.2d 300 (1980); State v. Schultz, 46 N.J. 254, 216 A. 2d 372 (N.J.1966); State v. Polk, 5 Or. App. 605, 485 P. 2d 1241 (…
• United States v. Warner, 428 F.2d 730 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …ically cover the situation in which either judge or prosecutor comments on defendant’s failure to take the stand where the defendant is presenting a pro se defense. United States ex rel. Miller v. Follette, 397 F. 2d 363 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1039, 89 S.Ct. 660, 21 L.Ed.2d 585 (1969); Redfield v. United States, 315 F. 2d 76 (9th Cir. 1963). The reasons for this are obvious and are exemplified by this case. Throughout the trial Warner exceeded proper procedural bounds. In questioning witnesses…
• United States v. Kaufman, 429 F.2d 240 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …will have a chance later to tell your side of the story, if you care to.” Garber has made no showing that the trial judge’s remark was prejudicial error. See, United States ex rel. Miller v. Follette, 397 F. 2d 363, 367 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1039, 89 S. Ct. 660, 21 L.Ed.2d 585 (1969). Throughout the trial, the trial judge sought to protect Garber’s constitutional rights, and, indeed, he helped him on various occasions to frame proper questions. Appellant Kaufman contends that the trial ju…