GRANT

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186 (4th Cir. 1976)
  …claims of error. We find no requirement of a new trial in any of them. The convictions are accordingly affirmed. AFFIRMED. . 21 U.S.C. § 846. . 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). . McWilliams v. United States (8th Cir. 1968), 394 F. 2d 41, 44, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1044, 89 S.Ct. 643, 21 L.Ed.2d 593 (1969). See Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966), 384 U.S. 333, 363, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600; Estes v. Texas (1965), 381 U.S. 532, 542-543, 85 S.Ct. 1628, 14 L.Ed.2d 543, reh. denied, 382 U.S. 875, 86 S.Ct. 18, 14 L.Ed.2d.…
• United States v. Graham, 548 F.2d 1302 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …dants did not move to strike this statement or request a cautionary instruction. The passing reference to these guns did not prejudice defendants or justify a mistrial. See McWilliams v. United States, 394 F. 2d 41, 47 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1044, 89 S.Ct. 643, 21 L.Ed.2d 593 (1969).13 Finally, Anderson contends that she was prejudiced when Government counsel allegedly displayed her criminal “rap sheet” before the jury. When an objection was lodged to this incident at trial, the District Co…
• Mayola v. State OF Ala., 623 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …v. Capo, 595 F. 2d at 1090. E. g., Murphy v. Florida, 421 U.S. 794, 798-99, 95 S.Ct. 2031, 2035-2036, 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975); United States v. Haldeman, 559 F. 2d at 60-61; McWilliams v. United States, 394 F. 2d 41, 44 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1044, 89 S.Ct. 643, 21 L.Ed.2d 593 (1969); Pamplin v. Mason, 364 F. 2d 1, 4-5 (5th Cir. 1966). See also, e. g., Jenkins v. Bordenkircher, 611 F. 2d 162, 165 (6th Cir. 1979) (reciting equivalent standard without referring to Rideau itself). These courts h…