URBANO
v.
READERS DIGEST ASSN., INC.

U.S. | 1969-01-20
No. 781
393 U.S. 1052 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Private Paul v. Winters, Jr., 412 F.2d 140 (9th Cir. 1969)
    …F.Supp. 659; Linsalata v. Clifford, S.D.N.Y., 1968, 290 F.Supp. 338; Goldstein v. Clifford, D.N.J., 1968, 290 F.Supp. 275; Morse v. Boswell, D.Md., 1968, 289 F.Supp. 812, aff’d per curiam, 4 Cir., 1968, 401 F. 2d 544, petition for cert. filed, 1968, 393 U.S. 1052, 89 S.Ct. 687, 21 L.Ed.2d 694. The only contrary decision of which we are aware is an unreported one of Judge Crary in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gion v. McNamara, Civ.No.67-1563-EC, January 9, 1968.…
  • …ardsmen called up as a unit and those called up as individuals. This precise Fifth Amendment equal protection argument was made and rejected in Morse v. Boswell, D.Md., 1968, 289 F.Supp 812, 819, aff’d per curiam, 401 F. 2d 544 (4 Cir.), cert. den., 393 U.S. 1052, 89 S.Ct. 687, 21 L.Ed.2d 694. The court there found a rational basis for the differing treatment. “Clearly, Congress could sensibly decide that trained units are more valuable and more needed than individual reservists.” Judge Kaufman’s reasoning a…
  • O'Mara v. Captain William Zebrowski, 447 F.2d 1085 (3d Cir. 1971)
    …29, 89 S.Ct. 1195, 22 L.Ed.2d 460 (1969) ; Fox v. Brown, 402 F. 2d 837 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 938, 89 S.Ct. 1219, 22 L.Ed.2d 471 (1969) ; Morse v. Boswell, 289 F.Supp. 812 (D.Md.), aff’d, 401 F. 2d 544 (4th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1052, 89 S.Ct. 687, 21 L.Ed.2d 694 (1969) ; Winters v. United States, 281 F.Supp. 289 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 390 F. 2d 879 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 896, 89 S.Ct. 188, 21 L.Ed.2d 177 (1968). . See, e. g., Bluth v. Laird, 435 F. 2d 1065 (4th Cir. 19…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw