ROSEE

v.

BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Coast Indian Community v. The United States, 550 F.2d 639 (Ct. Cl. 1977)
  …nole Nation v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 565, 618-20 (1944), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 719, 66 S.Ct. 24, 90 L.Ed. 426 (1945). . Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes v. United States, 401 F. 2d 785, 787-89, 185 Ct.Cl. 421, 425-28 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1055, 89 S.Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 696 (1969). In this case, lapse of time was also a factor, for the Government had consistently treated the appropriated land as its own (and part of a national forest) since the late 19th century. . See 25 C.F.R. § 161.1(a…
• The Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. The United States, 437 F.2d 458 (Ct. Cl. 1971)
  …federated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation, Mont. v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 398 (1965); Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation, Mont. v. United States, 185 Ct.Cl. 421, 401 F. 2d 785 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1055, 89 5. Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 696 (1969). . The Act of May 15, 1886, 24 Stat. 29, 44, contained a similar authorization. There is, however, no evidence in the record of [*474] negotiations with plaintiffs pursuant to tiie 1880 Act. . Defendant assert…
• Antoine v. United States, 710 F.2d 477 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …is similar to the present case. In both instances government error in determining title to land resulted in deprivation of property rights. See also Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. United States, 401 F. 2d 785 (Ct.C1.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1055, 89 S.Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 696 (1969) (taking effected by inclusion of tribal land in national forests following erroneous surveys). Regarding the amount of compensation recoverable in this case, the owner of property taken by the government is enti…