SUPER

v.

YEAGER, PRINCIPAL KEEPER

Citator

Cited By

• Levy v. Parker, 478 F.2d 772 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …s clear to this court that the law has progressed a long way from Reed. Undaunted, the government suggests that its position is vindicated by our decision in United States ex rel. Thompson v. Parker, 399 F. 2d 774, 776 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1059, 89 S.Ct. 701, 21 L.Ed.2d 701 (1969): “Under the principle announced in Bums, therefore, the district court, after determining that the military courts had given due consideration to [*781] petitioner’s contentions, quite correctly-refused to review…
• Murray v. Page, 429 F.2d 1359 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …nder the terms of, his original sentence. Okla.Stat. Ann. tit. 57, § 346 (1969). Subsequently, Murray sought relief in state court and his challenge to the revocation proceedings was denied. Murray v. State, 444 P. 2d 236 (Okl.Crim.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1059, 89 S.Ct. 702, 21 L.Ed.2d 701. The Oklahoma court held that revocation by the governor without notice or hearing violated no constitutional right claimed by Murray. That same court, however, a year later recognized the existence of federal constitut…