CONWAY

v.

CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• United States v. Hutul, 416 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …o give a limiting instruction on the evidence concerning the prior accident, sna sponte, was “so fundamental” as to deprive Sacks of a fair trial. See United States v. Schwartz, 398 F. 2d 464, 470 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. den. sub nom. Pyne v. U. S., 393 U.S. 1062, 89 S.Ct. 714, 21 L.Ed.2d 705; United States v. Smith, 283 F. 2d 760 (2d Cir. 1960), cert. den. 365 U.S. 851, 81 S.Ct. 815, 5 L.Ed.2d 815. The prior accident was one of a series of such fraudulent accidents which were part of an overall scheme to de…
• United States v. Lawson, 507 F.2d 433 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …ons for a mistrial was not erroneous. See United States v. Kidd, 446 F. 2d 1385, 1386 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Jiminez-Badilla, 434 F. 2d 170, 174 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Schwartz, 398 F. 2d 464, 470 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1062, 89 S.Ct. 714, 21 L.Ed.2d 705 (1969). VII Finally, Lawson contends that, with respect to the substantive count, there was a variance between the indictment and the evidence. The indictment for this count charged with the defendant and others did “…
• United States v. Rizzo, 418 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …t now object that such an instruction was not given. Rule 30, F.R.Crim.P.; Namet v. United States, 373 U.S. 179, 190, 83 S.Ct. 1151, 10 L.Ed.2d 278; United States v. Schwartz, 7 Cir., 398 F. 2d 464, 470, cert. denied, sub nom. Pyne v. United States, 393 U.S. 1062, 89 S.Ct. 714, 21 L.Ed.2d 705; United States v. Vasen, 7 Cir., 222 F. 2d 3, 5, 6, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 834, 76 S.Ct. 70, 100 L.Ed. 744. Defendants were obviously satisfied that no [*82] cautionary instruction was necessary, and the court’s failure…