MISKUNAS

v.

UNION CARBIDE CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Schattman v. Tex. Emp. Comm'n, 459 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …y for men). (On the other hand, a complete proscription of women jurors is violative of constitutional rights. White v. Crook (D.C.Ala.1966) 251 F. Supp. 401, 408); Miskunas v. Union Carbide Corporation, 7 Cir. 1968, 399 F. 2d 847, 850, cert. denied 393 U.S. 1066, 89 S.Ct. 718, 21 L.Ed.2d 709 (denial to wife, but not to husband, of right to recover for loss of consortium). (See, however, Kanowitz, Constitutional Aspects of Sex-based Discrimination in American Law, 48 Neb.L.Review 131, 143-151 (1968). This ar…
• Rawls v. United States, 566 F.2d 1373 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …this analytical framework, we conclude that the Secretary’s conclusion is supported by substantial evidence. The district court correctly affirmed it. Palmer v. Dredge Corp., 398 F. 2d 791 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied sub nom Dredge Corp. v. Penny, 393 U.S. 1066, 89 S.Ct. 715, 21 L.Ed.2d 709 (1969). Although the evidence at the administrative hearing was contradictory and the case hotly disputed, it is this court’s role only to review the record for substantial evidence in support of the Secretary’s decisi…
• Leslie F. Bleamaster and Norma v. Bleamaster, 448 F.2d 1289 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …pellants were without substantial relevance to the issues before the District Court, were not prejudicial, and did not require judgment for appellants. See Palmer v. Dredge Corp., 398 F. 2d 791, 795 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. den. Dredge Corp. v. Penny, 393 U.S. 1066, 89 S.Ct. 715, 21 L.Ed.2d 709 (1969).…