KROLL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Suarez v. State, 481 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 1985)
  …attorney in using such statements was not discussed. See, e.g., United States v. Vasquez, 476 F. 2d 730 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 836, 94 S.Ct. 181, 38 L.Ed.2d 72 (1973); Wilson v. United States, 398 F. 2d 331 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1069, 89 S.Ct. 727, 21 L.Ed.2d 712 (1969); Coughlan v. United States, 391 F. 2d 371 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 870, 89 S.Ct. 159, 21 L.Ed.2d 139 (1968); Mathies v. United States, 374 F. 2d 312 (D.C.Cir.1967). See generally Annot., 26 A.L.R. 4th 1…
• In re Petition of William D. Scott v. Commanding Officer, 431 F.2d 1132 (3d Cir. 1970)
  …are frequently in an evolutionary state. The appropriate inquiry, we believe, is whether petitioner’s beliefs crystallized or materially changed after the August 13 induction order. United States v. Kroll, 400 F. 2d 923 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1069, 89 S.Ct. 728, 21 L.Ed.2d 713 (1969) is not inconsistent with this view. In that case, it was admitted that registrant’s beliefs crystallized several months before the induction order, and thus there was no “change in status.” The court pointed out…
• United States v. Bienvenido Mercado Vasquez, 476 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …missible. See United States v. Brown, 459 F. 2d 319 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. De Loy, 421 F. 2d 900 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Venere, 416 F. 2d 144 (5th Cir. 1969); Wilson v. United States, 398 F. 2d 331 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1069, 89 S.Ct. 727, 21 L.Ed.2d 712 (1969). In this case where the defendant was carefully apprised of his right to have the advice of his counsel, there is no merit in the contention that the defendant was unable to waive that right. Vasquez also conten…