FONSECA

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lavin, 480 F.2d 657 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …ocal board, who, while having personal knowledge of the methods used, was not the maker of the records and lacked knowledge of the substantive accuracy of the contents. E. g., Nelloms v. United States, 399 F. 2d 295, 296 (5 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1071 (1969) ; Fults v. United States, 395 F. 2d 852, 854 (10 Cir. 1968) ; Doty v. United States, 218 F. 2d 93, 96 (8 Cir. 1955) ; United States v. Borisuk, 206 F. 2d 338, 340 (3 Cir. 1953). Cf. United States v. Rucker, 435 F. 2d 950, 951 (8 Cir. 1971) ;…
• GEE v. Colonel James M. Smith, 479 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …S. 310, 89 S.Ct. 1163, 22 L.Ed.2d 297 (1969); Sellers v. McNamara, 5 Cir., 1969, 398 F. 2d 893, cert. denied sub nom. Sellers v. Laird, 395 U.S. 950, 89 S.Ct. 2022, 23 L.Ed.2d 470; Nelloms v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 399 F. 2d 295, cert. denied, 393 U. S. 1071, 89 S.Ct. 724, 21 L.Ed.2d 716; Simmons v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F. 2d 456, cert. denied, 395 U.S. 982, 89 S.Ct. 2144, 23 L.Ed.2d 770. The same principle is applicable in those cases where the attack rests on the claim that a majority of…