TURNER ET AL.

v.

FOUCHE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sniadach v. Fam. Fin. Corp. of Bay View, 395 U.S. 337 (U.S. 1969)
  …e to satisfy the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Wisconsin Supreme Court sustained the lower state court in approving the procedure. 37 Wis. 2d 163, 154 N. W. 2d 259. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari. 393 U. S. 1078. The Wisconsin statute gives a plaintiff 10 days in which to serve the summons and complaint on the defendant after service on the garnishee.2 In this case petitioner was served the same day as the garnishee. She nonetheless claims that the Wiscons…
• Turner v. Fouche, 396 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1970)
  …. The appellants, complaining of the court’s failure to hold the challenged provisions of Georgia law invalid on their face and as applied, took a direct appeal [*353] to this Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1253, and we noted probable jurisdiction, 393 U. S. 1078.10 I The appellants urge that the constitutional and statutory scheme by which the Taliaferro County grand jury selects the board of education is unconstitutional on its face. They point to the discretion of the state superior [*354] court judge t…
• Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1969)
  …affirmed that judgment, and on October 23 the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed the appeal for want of a substantial constitutional question. The appellant then appealed to this Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1257, and we noted probable jurisdiction, 393 U. S. 1078. While the appeal was pending here, Ohio amended the controlling statute, effective October 30, 1969, reducing the signature requirement from 7% to 4%. We do not think the recent statutory amendment has rendered this case moot. For the appellant ha…