HENZEL

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• State v. Melendez, 244 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 1971)
  …dant, upon his reappearance at his trial, acquiesces in or ratifies the actions taken by his counsel during his absence. See Cole v. State, 199 So. 2d 480 (Fla.App. 3rd, 1967). In Henzel v. State, 212 So. 2d 92 (FIa.App.3rd, 1968), certiorari denied 393 U.S. 1085, 89 S.Ct. 870, 21 L.Ed.2d 778, rehearing denied 394 U.S. 967, 89 S.Ct. 1303, 22 L.Ed.2d 570, the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in discussing the application of the waiver doctrine to the requirement of a defendant’s presence at trial, st…
• Howard v. State, 484 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …5) (Pearson, Daniel S., J., concurring). As a general rule, a request for the defendant’s presence at any stage of the trial should be honored. See Henzel v. State, 212 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 218 So. 2d 165 (Fla.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1085, 89 S.Ct. 870, 21 L.Ed.2d 778 (1969). Where, as here, however, it is untimely and is made at a noncritical stage of trial, the trial court does not err in denying the request. By allowing the charge conference to proceed without raising the issue of…
• Henzel v. State, 235 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
  …e Court of Florida. Appellant’s petition was denied. See Henzel v. State, Fla.1968, 218 So. 2d 165. Thereafter appellant sought review of the decision in the Supreme Court of the United States. Appellant’s petition was denied. See Henzel v. Florida, 393 U.S. 1085, 89 S.Ct. 870, 21 L.Ed.2d 778 (1969). Appellant’s petition for rehearing was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States. See Henzel [*359] v. Florida, 394 U.S. 967, 89 S.Ct. 1303, 22 L.Ed.2d 570 (1969). Appellant has informed us that he therea…