POPE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• United States v. Reynoso-Ulloa, 548 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …eny the motion for mistrial”. Mummert contends that this evidence referred to prior conduct of Mummert which inadmissibly tended to show criminal disposition or character. See Parker v. United States, 400 F. 2d 248, 252 (9 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1097, 89 S.Ct. 892, 21 L.Ed.2d 789 (1969). This argument overlooks the fact that Mummert was relying on the defense of entrapment, which exposes a defendant to a “searching inquiry into his own conduct and predisposition as bearing upon that issue. If in…
• United States v. Perez, 491 F.2d 167 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …ablish motive or intent, or absence of mistake or accident, * * * or when the acts proved are so inextricably mixed or connected with the crime charged as to tend to prove it * Parker v. United States, 400 F. 2d 248, 252 (9 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1097, 89 S.Ct. 892, 21 L.Ed.2d 789 (1969). At oral argument counsel placed heavy reliance on Enriquez v. United States, 314 F. 2d 703 (9 Cir. 1963), where it was held that evidence of prior use and possession of marihuana was not admissible to show an i…
• United States v. Odell Marshall, 526 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …n scheme or design, a motive or intent, the absence of mistake or accident, or that the acts are so inextricably connected with the crime charged as to tend to prove it. Id.; Parker v. United States, 400 F. 2d 248, 252 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1097, 89 S.Ct. 892, 21 L.Ed.2d 789 (1969). The cocaine in this case was admitted only against defendants Marshall and Harris to show knowledge, intent and motive. Both heroin and cocaine are [*1361] “narcotic drugs” under 21 U.S.C. § 802(16); if the ju…