DELAGARDE
v.
KRUEGER, WARDEN; SHEFTON V. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY; CARTER V. MITCHELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.; AND BARNES V. TEXAS ET AL.
DELAGARDE
KRUEGER, WARDEN; SHEFTON V. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY; CARTER V. MITCHELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.; AND BARNES V. TEXAS ET AL.
393 U.S. 1115
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1970)…finding merit in the petitioner’s claim.4 The Court [*441] of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed, also upon the authority of Hoag v. New Jersey, supra. We granted certiorari to consider the important constitutional question this case presents. 393 U. S. 1115. As the District Court and the Court of Appeals correctly noted, the operative facts here are virtually identical to those of Hoag v. New Jersey, supra. In that case the defendant was tried for the armed robbery of three men who, along with others,…
-
Carter v. Jury Comm'n of Greene Cnty., 396 U.S. 320 (U.S. 1970)…of the challenged Alabama statutory provisions or to direct the Governor to appoint Negroes to the jury commission. From these rulings the appellants took a direct appeal to this Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1253. We noted probable jurisdiction. 393 U. S. 1115.7 [*329] I This is the first case to reach the Court in which an attack upon alleged racial discrimination in choosing juries has been made by plaintiffs seeking affirmative relief, rather than by defendants challenging judgments of criminal convic…
-
Hadley v. Junior Coll. Dist. of Metro. Kan. City, 397 U.S. 50 (U.S. 1970)…e Fourteenth Amendment. The Missouri Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s dismissal of the suit, stating that the “one man, one vote” principle was not applicable in this case. 432 S. W. 2d 328 (1968). We noted probable jurisdiction of the appeal, 393 U. S. 1115 (1969), and for the reasons set forth below we reverse and hold that the Fourteenth Amendment requires that the trustees of this junior college district be apportioned in a manner that does not deprive any voter of his right to have his own vote giv…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence