PRATT FOOD COMPANY
v.
J. M. LEE, AS COMPTROLLER

Fla. | 1936-12-01
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
126 Fla. 530 Florida Supreme Court (1936) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 171 So. 330
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

*531Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case should be reversed without prejudice and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court for reconsideration and further decree as the facts may warrant, not inconsistent with the holding of this Court in the case of Liggett Drug Company v. Lee, 126 Fla. 359, 171 Sou. Rep. 326, which was argued and submitted as a companion case to this case and decided at the present term.

Reversed without prejudice and remanded for further proceedings.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Borrego v. Lee, 132 Fla. 49 (Fla. 1938)
    …ve as a repeal of any other license tax occupation tax, excise tax, or other tax imposed by law as a prerequisite to engaging in business in this State. Liggett Drug Co., et al., v. Lee, Comptroller, 126 Fla. 359, 171 So. 326; Pratt Food Co. v. Lee, 126 Fla. 530, 171 So. 330; Dunlop Tire and Rubber Co., v. Lee, Comptroller, 126 Fla. 369, 171 So. 351; and Mason Lumber Co. v. Lee, Comptroller, 126 Fla. 371, 171 So. 332, are relied on to support this contention. The factual situation involved in these cases b…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw