BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
ABERDEEN & ROCKFISH RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; GARNER ET UX. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; PATRIARCA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; SUTTON V. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.; JOHN LANGENBACHER CO., INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; ROSEE V. BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.; VALENTI V. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, ET AL.; PROVISION SALESMEN & DISTRIBUTORS UNION, LOCAL 627, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS & BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; MARSON V. UNITED STATES; HILL V. UNITED STATES; ROBINSON V. UNITED STATES; THOMPSON V. PARKER, WARDEN; HARRIS V. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
ABERDEEN & ROCKFISH RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; GARNER ET UX. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; PATRIARCA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; SUTTON V. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.; JOHN LANGENBACHER CO., INC. V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; ROSEE V. BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.; VALENTI V. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, ET AL.; PROVISION SALESMEN & DISTRIBUTORS UNION, LOCAL 627, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS & BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; MARSON V. UNITED STATES; HILL V. UNITED STATES; ROBINSON V. UNITED STATES; THOMPSON V. PARKER, WARDEN; HARRIS V. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
393 U.S. 1124
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Coleman Stewart and Maria Stewart v. Green, 300 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 1974)…e the existence of a reasonable relationship between the purpose of the act and the class included, it must be found to be constitutional. Adams v. Sutton, 212 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1968), App. dismissed 393 U.S. 404, 89 S.Ct. 681, 21 L.Ed.2d 630, reh. den. 393 U.S. 1124, 89 S.Ct. 988, 22 L.Ed.2d 132 and Daniels v. O’Conner (Fla.1971), 243 So. 2d 144. Unlike the tenant in an apartment house who, upon eviction, merely has personal possessions to move, the mobile home tenant, renting space in a lot or park, has to in…
-
United States v. Medina, 455 F.2d 209 (1st Cir. 1971)…While defense counsel vigorously criticized government witnesses, thus perhaps inviting zealous rejoiner, see Patriarca v. United States, 402 F. 2d 314, 318-322 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022, 89 S.Ct. 633, 21 L.Ed.2d 567, reh. denied, 393 U.S. 1124, 89 S.Ct. 987, 22 L.Ed.2d 131 (1969), a United States prosecutor should constantly resist the [*211] temptation to accept an invitation to cheapen an argument by recourse to unnecessary vilification. Here some of the prosecutorial ardor was proper c…