ROBINSON ET AL.
v.
JOHNSON ET AL.
ROBINSON ET AL.
JOHNSON ET AL.
394 U.S. 847
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 23 L. Ed. 2d 30 · 89 S. Ct. 1622 · SCDB 1968-095 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1707
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kaiser v. Cahn, 510 F.2d 282 (2d Cir. 1974)…upreme Court. 28 A.D.2d 647, 282 N.Y. S.2d 207 (2d Dept.), aff’d, 21 N.Y.2d 86, 286 N.Y.S.2d 801, 233 N.E. 2d 818 (1967), aff’d, 394 U.S. 280, 89 S.Ct. 1044, 22 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). It was only after the Supreme Court denied rehearing, 394 U.S. 1025, 89 S.Ct. 1622, 23 L.Ed.2d 50 (1969), that Kaiser reentered prison on July 9, 1969 to complete his sentence. Kaiser brought this action for $500,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages against the District Attorney who prosecuted him, on alle…
-
Ry. Labor Executives Ass'n v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 833 F.2d 700 (7th Cir. 1987)…ispute is major, the parties must attempt to resolve it through negotiation, mediation and possible presidential intervention. See Railroad Trainmen v. Terminal Co., 394 U.S. 369, 378, 89 S.Ct. 1109, 1115, 22 L.Ed.2d 344, reh. denied, 394 U.S. 1024, 89 S.Ct. 1622, 22 L.Ed.2d 51 (1969). If a major dispute cannot be resolved, the union can strike in support of its position. National Ry. Labor Conference v. International Ass’n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 830 F. 2d 741, 745 (7th Cir.1987); Chicago and…
-
In re Sch. Asbestos Litig. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. v. The Honorable James McGirr Kelly, 921 F.2d 1310 (3d Cir. 1990)…es the precept that in a federal class action only the citizenship of the named class representatives must be diverse from that of the defendants. Snyder v. Harris, 394 U.S. 332, 340, 89 S.Ct. 1053, 1058, 22 L.Ed.2d 319, reh’g denied, 394 U.S. 1025, 89 S.Ct. 1622, 23 L.Ed.2d 50 (1969); see In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., 818 F. 2d 145, 162 (2d Cir.1987); 3B J. Moore & J. Kennedy, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.95, at 23-546 (2d ed.1987); C. Wright, Law of Federal Courts § 31, at 170 (4th ed.1983); 13B…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence