MONTGOMERY, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, ET AL.
v.
BURNS ET AL.

U.S. | 1969-05-05
No. 438
Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644., Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.
394 U.S. 848 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 23 L. Ed. 2d 31 · 89 S. Ct. 1623 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1708 · SCDB 1968-096
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644.

Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Jhirad v. Ferrandina, 536 F.2d 478 (2d Cir. 1976)
    …aring below occurred on remand from a habeas appeal and that he was therefore entitled to all the procedural protections afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 2246. See also, Harris v. Nelson, 394 U.S. 286, 89 S.Ct. 1082, 22 L.Ed.2d 281, reh. den., 394 U.S. 1025, 89 S.Ct. 1623, 23 L.Ed.2d 50 (1969). The decision in Harris upon which appellant so heavily relies merely points out that the district judge has the right to authorize such discovery procedures “as law and justice require,” 28 U.S.C. § 2243. It plainly does not…
  • In re Estelle, 516 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1975)
    …tain discretionary acts [*484] lie within the inherent authority of the trial court, despite the lack of specific authorization by statute or rule. See, e.g., Harris v. Nelson, 394 U.S. 286, 89 S.Ct. 1082, 22 L.Ed.2d 281, reh. denied, 394 U.S. 1025, 89 S.Ct. 1623, 23 L.Ed.2d 50 (1969), where the Supreme Court held that the district court had inherent authority to compel answers to interrogatories in habeas corpus proceedings, and thus that mandamus would not lie to prevent the district court from so ordering…
  • Loper v. Beto, 440 F.2d 934 (5th Cir. 1971)
    …ed at that time. No one knows now what decision the Board will reach at that time but don’t give up hope. Continue your good adjustment and make the best ratings possible. . 394 U.S. 286, 89 S.Ct. 1082, 22 L.Ed. 281 (1969), reh. den. 394 U.S. 1025, 89 S.Ct. 1623, 23 L.Ed.2d 50. . Id. at 300, 89 S.Ct. at 1091, 22 L.Ed.2d 291. . See: United States v. Wolfson, 413 F. 2d 804, 807 (2d Cir. 1969) ; Wilson v. Wiegel, 387 F. 2d 632 (9th Cir. 1967) ; Wilson v. Harris, 378 F. 2d 141, 142 (9th Cir. 1967) ; United St…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw