GREEN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Matera, 266 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1972)
  …825, 828 (Fla.1963). . 173 F. 2d 316, 317 (CCA 4th), cert. denied 337 U.S. 944, 69 S.Ct. 1500, 93 L.Ed. 1747 (1949). . 160 So. 2d 730, 731 (Fla.App.1964). . Id. at 732. . Anderson v. United States, 403 F. 2d 451, 454 (CCA 7th 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 903. 89 S.Ct. 1009, 22 L.Ed.2d 215 (1969) : “The law applicable to the knowing use of perjury at trial is settled. A criminal conviction procured by the use of testimony known by the prosecuting authorities to be perjured and knowingly used by them in o…
• United States v. Scherer, 673 F.2d 176 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …ejudiced petitioner at trial.” United States v. Scherer, No. 74 CR 99 at 5 (N.D.Ill. March 3, 1981) (Scherer III). The existence of minor differences does not amount to perjury. Anderson v. United States, 403 F. 2d 451 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 903, 89 S.Ct. 1009, 22 L.Ed.2d 215 (1969); United States v. Spadafora, 200 F. 2d 140 (7th Cir. 1952). Moreover, Scherer’s contention that the date discrepancy could have been used for cross-examination purposes fails. Exhibit 30, dated October 5 and co…
• United States v. Buford L. Peak & Bennie L. Peak, 856 F.2d 825 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …t.” Carey v. Duckworth, 738 F. 2d 875, 878 (7th Cir.1984); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1621. “Mere inconsistencies or conflicts [in] the testimony of a witness ... are not enough.” Anderson v. United States, 403 F. 2d 451, 454 (7th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 903, 89 S.Ct. 1009, 22 L.Ed.2d 215 (1969). No inquiries were made as to the reason for Alter’s inconsistent statements. He may have been confused, forgetful or mistaken. The record is devoid of specific evidence that Alter’s second statement, that he lo…