COLEMAN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Alexander, 471 F.2d 923 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …egy of putting defendant on the stand would have been different if the higher charge had been absent. The court did not cite the Willems case in its opinion. See also Evans v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 114, 397 F. 2d 675 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 907, 89 S.Ct. 1016, 22 L.Ed.2d 218 (1969), where appellants were charged and tried on counts of first degree murder, felony murder, and attempted robbery. They were convicted of the last two, but acquitted of the first. In response to appellants’ claim…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Millings, 535 F.2d 121 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …refers us to decisions of this court holding that narcotics offenses may be used to impeach a witness. United States v. McIntosh, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 237, 426 F. 2d 1231 (1970); Evans v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 114, 397 F. 2d 675, cert. denied, 394 U.S. 907, 89 S.Ct. 1016, 22 L.Ed.2d 218 (1969); Brooke v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 19, 385 F. 2d 279 (1967). In those cases however the question was whether the prior convictions could be used under D.C.Code (1967 ed.) § 14-305, which provided that an…
• United States v. Stein, 456 F.2d 844 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …t the right is a relative one. Compare United States v. Borman, 437 F. 2d 44, 46 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 913, 91 S.Ct. 1394, 28 L.Ed.2d 655 (1971), with Evans v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 114, 397 F. 2d 675, 676 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 907, 89 S. Ct. 1016, 22 L.Ed.2d 218 (1969). Speedy trial questions must be analyzed by examining four factors: (1) length of the delay; (2) reason for the delay; (3) prejudice to the defendant; and (4) [*848] waiver by the defendant. United States ex re…