ARNOLD

v.

MCGUINESS

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Sanchez v. Standard Brands, Inc., 431 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …te that it is of minimal value in its explication. See Dent v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., supra, 406 F. 2d at 403; Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co., 4 Cir. 1968, 405 F. 2d 645, cert. denied, Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Walker, 394 U. S. 918, 89 S.Ct. 1189, 22 L.Ed.2d 451. The basic purposes of the Act, however, are clearly discernible. Mindful of the remedial and humanitarian underpinnings of Title VII and of the crucial role played by the private litigant in the statutory scheme,1 co…
• MacKlin v. Spector Freight Sys., Inc., 478 F.2d 979 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …rict Courts under Title VII. Stebbins v. Continental Insurance Companies, supra. See also Miller v. International Paper Co., 5 Cir., 408 F. 2d 283, 284-285 (1969); Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., 4 Cir., 405 F. 2d 645, 652 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 918, 89 S.Ct. 1189, 22 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969). In addition to requiring EEOC clearance before suit may be filed in court, Title VII also imposes a timely filing requirement for filing a complaint with the agency in the first place. Section 706(d), 42 U.S.C…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Waters v. Wis. Steel Works OF Int'l Harvester Co., 427 F.2d 476 (7th Cir. 1970)
  …urisdictional barrier to filing suit in a district court. Miller v. International Paper Co., 408 F. 2d 283 (5th Cir. 1969); Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line R. R. Co., 405 F. 2d 645 (4th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Walker, 394 U.S. 918, 89 S.Ct. 1189, 22 L.Ed.2d 451 (1969). Moreover, courts have allowed complainants who have not been before the EEOC to join with complainants who have been before the agency as members of a class seeking relief against a common employer. Bowe v. Co…