DALY

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• SP/4 A. R. Montgomery, IV v. Rumsfeld, 572 F.2d 250 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …“agency” as used in this section apparently includes the Army. 5 U.S.C. § 701(b)(1). See Ornato v. Hoffman, 546 F. 2d 10, 14 (2d Cir. 1976); United States ex rel. Schonbrun v. Commanding Officer, 403 F. 2d 371, 375 n.2 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 929, 89 S.Ct. 1195, 22 L.Ed.2d 460 (1969). There is language in Consolidated Mines, supra, 455 F. 2d at 440, arguably suggesting that not only does section 10(c) not require the exhaustion of intra-agency appeals not mandated by statute or regulation,…
• Langevin v. Chenango Court, Inc., 447 F.2d 296 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …nreviewability: A Functional Analysis of “Committed to Agency Discretion,” 82 Harv.L.Rev. 367, 372-73, notes 28 and 29 (1968). . See, e. g., United States ex rel. Schonbrun v. Commanding Officer, 403 F. 2d 371, 375 n. 2 (2 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 929, 89 S.Ct. 1195, 22 L.Ed.2d 460 (1969) ; Cappadora v. Celebrezze, 356 F. 2d 1 (2 Cir. 1966) ; Kletschka v. Driver, 411 F. 2d 436 (2 Cir. 1969) ; Wong Wing Hang v. I. N. S., 360 F. 2d 715 (2 Cir. 1966). . The majority opinion, written by the same Jus…
• Aguayo v. Elliot R. Richardson, 473 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …e against restraints and monopolies” within 28 U.S. C. § 1337. Id. Finally, despite the breadth with which we have read 28 U. S.C. § 1361, see United States ex rel. Schonbrun v. Commanding Officer, 403 F. 2d 371, 374-375 (2 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 929, 89 S.Ct. 1195, 22 L.Ed.2d 460 (1969); Cortright v. Resor, 447 F. 2d 245, 250-51 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965, 92 S.Ct. 1172, 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972), we cannot properly characterize this as an “action in the nature of mandamus to compel…