PYLES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Brown v. State, 245 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 1971)
  …olely by the introduction of damaging evidence. Coconspirators and codefendants have been accorded no special standing.” Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 171, 172, 89 S.Ct. 961, 965, 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969) ; reh. den. Ivanov v. United States, 394 U.S. 939, 89 S.Ct. 1177, 22 L.Ed.2d 475. The restrictions upon search and seizure were obviously designed against official invasion of privacy and the security of property. Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960); Wong Sun v…
• State v. Williams, 424 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …ence. Coconspirators and codefendants have been accorded no special standing.’” Brown v. State, 245 So. 2d 68, 74 (Fla.1971), quoting with approval from Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 171-72, 89 S.Ct. 961, 965, 22 L.Ed.2d 176, reh’g denied 394 U.S. 939, 89 S.Ct. 1177, 22 L.Ed.2d 475 (1969). Once the officers had seized what appeared to be “quaaludes” from the two girls after having observed the appellee give the items to the girls, they then had probable cause to arrest the appellee. The subseque…
• United States v. Peterson, 524 F.2d 167 (4th Cir. 1975)
  …d.2d 1081, reh. denied, 368 U.S. 871, 82 S.Ct. 23, 7 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961), require that the evidence suppressed as to him should not have been used at all. In Alderman v. United States (1969) 394 U.S. 165, 171, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176, reh. denied 394 U.S. 939, 89 S.Ct. 1177, 22 L.Ed.2d 475 (1969), the Court expressly rejected such an expansive reading of the rule to proscribe the use of illegally seized evidence in “all proceedings or against all persons.” 25 The mere fact that evidence may be inadmissib…