KARCHER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gardner, 516 F.2d 334 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …26 L.Ed.2d 297 (1970). Since the $5,000 limitation in the statute was not designed to protect receivers of stolen goods, but only to avoid overtaxing the Department of Justice, United States v. Riso, 405 F. 2d 134, 137 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 959, 89 S.Ct. 1306, 22 L.Ed.2d 560 (1969), determining value at the date of theft as well as the date of receipt, so long as that value at either time is $5,000 or more, advances the purposes behind the statute while at the same time maintaining the $5,…
• Heffley v. Hocker, 420 F.2d 881 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …. 2d 44, 50 (8th Cir. 1969); Creighton v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 115, 406 F. 2d 651, 652 (1968); People v. Harris, 67 Cal.2d 866, 64 Cal.Rptr. 313, 434 P. 2d 609 (1968). Cf. United States v. Riso, 405 F. 2d 134 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 959, 89 S.Ct. 1306, 22 L.Ed.2d 560 (1969). Nor is a warrant required under authority of Harris, supra, to inspect evidence in possession of police. Westover v. United States, 394 F. 2d 164, 165 (9th Cir. 1968). There is no argument with the proposition…
• Giordano v. Modern AIR Transport/IBT Sys. Bd. OF Adjustment, 504 F.2d 882 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …or exceeded its jurisdiction in determining the dispute in issue, a federal court must defer to the System Board of Adjustment’s decision on the merits of the controversy. Rosen v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 400 F. 2d 462 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 959, 89 S.Ct. 1307, 22 L.Ed.2d 560 (1969); Arnold v. United Airlines, Inc., 296 F. 2d 191 (7th Cir. 1961). We, therefore, can reverse the System Board only where there is a denial of due process before the Board, and our review does not extend to proce…