TYLER ET UX.

v.

INGRAHAM, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Wheeler v. Montgomery, 397 U.S. 280 (U.S. 1970)
  …District Court for the Northern District of California held that the California procedure for pre-termination review in welfare cases satisfies the requirements of the Due Process Clause, 296 F. Supp. 138 (1968), and we noted probable jurisdiction, 394 U. S. 970 (1969). This procedure requires notice to the recipient of the proposed discontinuance or suspension at least three days prior to its effective date, together with reasons for the intended action and a statement of what information or action is requ…
• Utah Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. EL Paso Natural GAS Co., 395 U.S. 464 (U.S. 1969)
  …cates a mandate we have entered in a cause.2 Our mandate is involved here. We therefore ordered oral argument at which all parties concerned were afforded an opportunity to be heard on the question whether there had been compliance with the mandate. 394 U. S. 970. At the oral argument a number of appellees supported appellant’s motion. They included the United States, the State of California, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, Intermountain Gas Company, Northwest Natural Gas Compan…

  ← 1 / 2 →