MCMENAMA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Barrows v. Hickel, 447 F.2d 80 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …ision that the loss of a market for the sand and gravel resulting from the injunction could not be permitted to prejudice appellants’ asserted rights to the Grout Creek claim. United States v. Barrows, 404 F. 2d 749, 752 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. den., 394 U.S. 974, 89 S.Ct. 1468, 22 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969). Finally, we reject appellant's contention that the District Court was required to determine the individual liabilities of the various appellants before granting relief to the United States. The court’s order p…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Clear Gravel Enters., Inc. v. Nolan Keil, 505 F.2d 180 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …or small tract purposes, 43 U.S.C. § 682a et seq., and on July 23, 1955 when common variety sand and gravel deposits as here involved became no longer locatable. 30 U.S.C. § 611. United States v. Barrows, 404 F. 2d 749 (9th Cir., 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 974, 89 S.Ct. 1468, 22 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969). The claims in question were located for sand and gravel on January 21, 1946 and represent the last two of Appellant’s sixteen association placer claims of 160 acres each of sand and gravel deposits in the Las…
• Charlestone Stone Prods. Co., Inc. v. Andrus, 553 F.2d 1209 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …ould be extracted, removed and marketed at a profit on . July 23, 1955 when common variety sand and gravel deposits as here involved became no longer locatable. 30 U.S.C. § 611. United States v. Barrows, 404 F. 2d 749 (9th Cir., 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 974, 89 S.Ct. 1468, 22 L.Ed.2d 754 .. . (1969).” Clear Gravel Enterprises, supra at 180-81. Section 611, in its pertinent parts, reads: “No deposit of common varieties of sand, stone, gravel . . . shall be deemed a valuable mineral deposit within the m…