BUFALINO
v.
MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.
BUFALINO
MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.
394 U.S. 987
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bush v. Viterna, 740 F.2d 350 (5th Cir. 1984)…Tribe of Uintah and Ouray Reservation, 417 F. 2d 1305, 1308 (10th Cir.1969) (tactical differences do not make inadequate the representation of those whose interests are identical); Acuff v. United Papermakers, 404 F. 2d 169 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987, 89 S.Ct. 1466, 22 L.Ed.2d 762 (1968) (decision not to take an appeal does not show inadequate representation). If this were so, the requirement that the would-be intervenor show inadequacy of representation would be effectively written out of the…
-
Nehemiah Mungin v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 416 F.2d 1169 (5th Cir. 1969)…ion between the Union and members seeking to intervene, etc., the Court must determine to what extent or upon what terms it will deal with such dual voices. Cf. Acuff v. United Papermakers and Paperworkers, 5 Cir., 1968, 404 F. 2d 169, cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987, 89 S.Ct. 1466, 22 L.Ed.2d 762.…
-
Anderson v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 773 F.2d 880 (7th Cir. 1985)…final [arbitration] award ... except on the grounds of fraud, deceit or breach of duty of fair representation,” or inadequate grievance procedure); Acuff v. Papermakers and Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, 404 F. 2d 169, 171 n. 2 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 987, 89 S.Ct. 1466, 22 L.Ed.2d 762 (1969) (employee did not have standing to challenge arbitration award under the Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 10, when the union and the employer were sole parties to the arbitration); United States Postal Service v. Ame…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence