REECE

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.; WATSON V. SCHNECKLOTH, CONSERVATION CENTER SUPERINTENDENT; JENNISON V. UNITED STATES; MCGURRIN V. SHOVLIN, STATE HOSPITAL SUPERINTENDENT; SMITH V. LAIRD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE; FURTAK V. MANCUSI, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. Water & Utils., Inc. v. Metro. Dade Cnty. Envirmonental Quality Control Bd., 46 Fla. Supp. 59 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1977)
  …Sarasota County v. Barg, 302 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1974); Lasky v. State Farm Ins. Co., 296 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1974); City of Miami v. Kayfetz, 92 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 1957); United Telephone Co. of Florida v. Mayo, 215 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 995 (1969). Petitioner has failed to meet this heavy burden herein. There is no doubt, and petitioner does not dispute, that quality of service may, at present, be considered as a factor in the utility rate making procedure of regulatory bodies. Moreov…
• D. C. Transit Sys., Inc. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Comm'n, 466 F.2d 394 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …ion and affirmed by Court of Appeals, reversed by North Carolina Supreme Court, holding that commission had improperly failed to examine and evaluate inadequate services) ; United Tel. Co. v. Mayo, 215 So. 2d 609, 610 (Fla., 1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 995, 89 S.Ct. 1589, 22 L.Ed.2d 74 (1969) (commission decision withholding rate increase pending service improvements- affirmed). Gf. Township Committee of Lakewood v. Lakewood Water Co., 54 N.J.Super. 371, 148 A. 2d 885, 890-892 (1959). . D.C. Transit…
• C & L Farms, Inc. v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 771 F.2d 407 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …grounds. Sanchez-Mariani v. Ellingwood, 691 F. 2d 592, 594 (1st Cir.1982); Zapata v. Smith, 437 F. 2d 1024 (5th Cir.1971); Smith v. McNamara, 395 F. 2d 896, 898 (10th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 934, 89 S.Ct. 1211, 22 L.Ed.2d 466, reh. denied, 394 U.S. 995, 89 S.Ct. 1477, 22 L.Ed.2d 773 (1969); Wallach v. Cannon, 357 F. 2d at 559. While we do not suggest that, absent service of process as required by Rule 4(d)(4), (5), a district court may enter judgment on the merits against a government agency or t…