PARKER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Louin Ray Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 945, 94 S.Ct. 3067, 41 L.Ed.2d 664 (1974) (revelation of criminal records of co-defendants is not so prejudical as to warrant a severance); Parker v. United States, 404 F. 2d 1193 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1004, 89 S.Ct. 1602, 22 L.Ed.2d 782 (1969) (severance not warranted though co-defendant took stand and testified to his own prior criminal record). 6. Curtailment of Cross-Examination Hamilton and Harter assert that the trial court committed error in l…
• United States v. Kaplan, 554 F.2d 958 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …asion we have observed: “The power vested in the district court pursuant to Rule 14 is discretionary, and the only question on appeal is whether such discretion has been abused. Parker v. United States, 404 F. 2d 1193 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1004, 89 S.Ct. 1602, 22 L.Ed.2d 782 (1969). The test is whether a joint trial is so prejudicial to one defendant as to require the exercise of that discretion in only one way, that is, by ordering a separate trial.” United States v. Thomas, 453 F. 2d 141…
• United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …trial court’s discretion and reversal is appropriate only if abuse of that discretion has been shown. Schaffer v. United States, 362 U.S. 511, 80 S.Ct. 945, 4 L.Ed.2d 921 (1960); Parker v. United States, 404 F. 2d 1193 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1004, 89 S.Ct. 1602, 22 L.Ed.2d 782 (1969). The test is whether a joint trial was so prejudicial to a defendant as to require the exercise of the trial judge’s discretion in only one way, that is, by ordering a separate trial. United States v. Thomas, 4…