COLEMAN ET AL.
v.
ALABAMA

U.S. | 1969-05-05
No. 1192
394 U.S. 1011 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1970)
    …als, 409 F. 2d, at 126-127. Miss Adickes, in seeking review here, claims that the District Court erred both in directing a verdict on the substantive count, and in granting summary judgment on the conspiracy count. Last Term we granted cer-tiorari, 394 U. S. 1011 (1969), and we now reverse and remand for further proceedings on each of the two counts. As explained in Part I, because the respondent failed to show the absence of any disputed material fact, we think the District Court erred in granting summary…
  • Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1970)
  • Hall et ux. v. Beals, 396 U.S. 45 (U.S. 1969)
    …stitutional. Hall v. Beals, 292 F. Supp. 610 (D. C. Colo.).3 As a result the appellants did not vote in the 1968 presidential election. They took a direct appeal to this Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1253, and we noted [*48] probable jurisdiction, 394 U. S. 1011. Thereafter the Colorado Legislature reduced the residency requirement for a presidential election from six months to two months. The 1968 election is history, and it is now impossible to grant the appellants the relief they sought in the District…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw