BLOOMFIELD

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Greene, 497 F.2d 1068 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …defense was actually attempting to introduce a prior consistent statement. The introduction of prior consistent statements has been left to the discretion of the trial court. United States v. Lewis, 406 F. 2d 486, 492 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1013, 89 S.Ct. 1630, 23 L.Ed.2d 39; Affronti v. United States, 145 F. 2d 3, 8 (8th Cir. 1944). Here, any prior consistent statements in Mrs. Estopinal’s letter were made after a motive to falsify arose, i. e., the arrest of her son. Further, we have some…
• United States v. Clay, 481 F.2d 133 (7th Cir. 1973)
  …d States v. Esposito (7th Cir., June 12, 1973). . See United States v. Lee, 413 F. 2d 910, 912 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1022, 90 S.Ct. 595, 24 L.Ed.2d 515; United States v. Lewis, 406 F. 2d 486, 493-494 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1013, 89 S.Ct. 1630, 23 L.Ed.2d 39; United States v. Jones, 403 F. 2d 498, 500 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 947, 89 S.Ct. 1280, 22 L.Ed.2d 480; United States v. Deloney, 389 F. 2d 324 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 904, 88 S.Ct. 1652,…