BUCKLEY ET AL., DBA BUCKLEY'S AUTO WRECKING
v.
OHIO BY BARBUTO
BUCKLEY ET AL., DBA BUCKLEY'S AUTO WRECKING
OHIO BY BARBUTO
395 U.S. 163
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Lawrence, 740 F.2d 1362 (6th Cir. 1984)…xistence of reasonable grounds for making a distinction between those within and those outside a designated class.” Beatty, 67 Ohio St.2d at 491, 424 N.E. 2d 586; see State v. Buckley, 16 Ohio St.2d 128, 134, 243 N.E. 2d 66 (1968), appeal dismissed, 395 U.S. 163, 89 S.Ct. 1647, 23 L.Ed.2d 174 (1969). We find, under this “rational basis” standard, that section 2305.131 satisfies equal protection requirements. Statutes of repose for designers and builders like section 2305.131 affect suits that could be brou…