BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN ET AL.

v.

O'CONNELL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Newburger v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …Fed.R.Civ.P. 13(b), unless it [*1071] rests upon an independent jurisdictional ground. United States v. Heyward-Robinson Company, supra, 430 F. 2d at 1080-81; O’Connell v. Erie Lackawanna R.R. Co., 391 F. 2d 156, 163 (2d Cir. 1968), vacated as moot, 395 U.S. 210, 89 S.Ct. 1767, 23 L.Ed.2d 213 (1969); Lesnik v. Public Industrials Corporation, 144 F. 2d 968, 976 n. 10 (2d Cir. 1944). Although there has been some criticism of the requirement of an independent jurisdictional ground for permissive counterclaim…
• United States v. Nall, 437 F.2d 1177 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …if made after the conspiracy has ended. That is the teaching of Krulewitch v. United States, supra [336 U.S. 440, 69 S.Ct. 716, 93 L.Ed. 790], and Fiswick v. United States, supra." Most recently in Dutton v. Evans, 1970, 400 U.S. 74, 91 S.Ct. 210, 23 L.Ed.2d 213, the Court again stated the principle: “It is settled that in federal conspiracy trials the hearsay exception that allows evidence of an out-of-court statement of one conspirator to be admitted against his fellow conspirators applies only if the st…
• United States v. The Heyward-Robinson Co., Inc., 430 F.2d 1077 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …this circuit, if they are permissive there is no Federal jurisdiction over them unless they rest on independent jurisdictional grounds. O'Connell v. Erie Lackawanna R. R. Co., 391 F. 2d 156, 163 (2d Cir. 1968), vacated and ordered dismissed as moot, 395 U.S. 210, 89 S.Ct. 1767, 23 L.Ed.2d 213 (1969); Lesnik v. Public Industrials Corporation, 144 F. 2d 968, 976 n. 10 (2d Cir. 1944); Fraser v. Astra Steamship Corp., 18 F.R.D. 240, 241-242 (S.D.N.Y.1955) ; Telegraph Delivery Service v. Florists Tel. Service, 1…