MCNEIL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Cornelious Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …r claims. McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. at 198 n. 16, & 200, 89 S.Ct. 1657. However, the issue was deliberately left open. This is evident from the Court’s language in the cited references, and from the Court’s action in McNeil v. United States, 395 U.S. 463, 89 S.Ct. 2025, 23 L.Ed.2d 446 (1969). In McNeil the Court of Appeals had held that the defendant was barred from attacking his local board’s denial of his conscientious objector claim because he had not taken an appeal to the state board. United St…
• United States v. Davis, 413 F.2d 148 (4th Cir. 1969)
  …because of failure to administratively appeal and failure to offer any excuse for such failure. Our decision was vacated with instructions to reconsider in the light of McKart. United States v. McNeil, 401 F. 2d 527 (4th Cir.), vacated and remanded, 395 U.S. 463, 89 S.Ct. 2025, 23 L.Ed.2d 446 (June 9, 1969). . McKart v. United States, supra, at 195, 89 S.Ct., at 1663. . Id. at 200, 89 S.Ct., at 1666. . Id., at 206, 89 S.Ct., at 1669. . United States v. Crowley, 405 F. 2d 400 (4tli Cir. 1968); United Sta…
• United States v. McGEE, 426 F.2d 691 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …ccept alternate service as a “basis in fact” for denying a I-O classification. . So far as we have been able to determine, United States v. McNeil), 401 F. 2d 527 (4 Cir. 1968), vacated and remanded for further consideration in the light of McKart, 395 U.S. 463, 89 S.Ct. 2025, 23 L.Ed.2d 446 (1969), has not been again decided. . Communication between the appeal board and the local board could well have developed the true facts. . The language from, the opinion quoted in the dissent must be read in this c…