MOYA ET UX.
v.
DEBACA, DBA DEBACA & CO. CREDIT & COLLECTION AGENCY, ET AL.

U.S. | 1969-06-23
No. 996
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan would vacate the judgment and remand the case in light of Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, ante, p. 337.
395 U.S. 825 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Caution
Also reported at: 23 L. Ed. 2d 740 · 89 S. Ct. 2136 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1173 · SCDB 1968-140
Cited by 12 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan would vacate the judgment and remand the case in light of Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, ante, p. 337.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Etta Jane Brown v. Liberty Loan Corp. OF Duval, 539 F.2d 1355 (5th Cir. 1976)
    …. The writ of garnishment was issuable on the unsworn motion of the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s attorney during the course of litigation. . The appellant also urges that the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Moya v. DeBaca, 1969, 395 U.S. 825, 89 S.Ct. 2136, 23 L.Ed.2d 740, aff’g, D.N.M.1968, 286 F.Supp. 606, requires reversal of the district court’s holding in this case. Although the Moya issue is virtually identical to the one we face here, summary affirmances by the Supreme Court may not create bind…
  • McCAHEY v. L.P. Invs., 774 F.2d 543 (2d Cir. 1985)
    …4 (Griffin does not completely undercut Endicott); Haines, 603 F.Supp. at 476 (Endicott was basis for Griffin). Indeed, members of the Court have since expressed some doubt about the continuing vitality of Endicott. See Moya v. DeBaca, 395 U.S. 825, 89 S.Ct. 2136, 23 L.Ed.2d 740 (1969) appeal dismissed, (Harlan, Brennan, JJ., dissenting in light of Sniadach); Hanner v. DeMarcus, 390 U.S. 736, 742, 88 S.Ct. 1437, 1441, 20 L.Ed.2d 270 (1967) cert. dismissed as improvidently granted (Douglas, J., dissenting) ("…
  • Duranceau v. Wallace, 743 F.2d 709 (9th Cir. 1984)
    …ferent from “ordinary judgment” for “unconditional sum certain”); Katz v. Ke Nam Kim, 379 F.Supp. 65 (D.Haw.1974); Langford v. Tennessee, 356 F.Supp. 1163 (W.D.Tenn.1973); Moya v. DeBaca, 286 F.Supp. 606 (D.N.M.1968), appeal dismissed, 395 U.S. 825, 89 S.Ct. 2136, 23 L.Ed.2d 740 (1969). Others have reached the opposite result. See Finberg v. Sullivan, 634 F. 2d 50 (3d Cir.1980) (en banc); Clay v. Fisher, 584 F.Supp. 730 (S.D.Ohio 1984); Dionne v. Bouley, 583 F.Supp. 307 (D.R.I.1984); Deary v. Guardian Loan…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw