ROSADO ET AL.
v.
WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stay Of Injunction cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
The motions of Joseph Barbaro et al. and American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae are granted. The motion to expedite review is denied.
The application to vacate the stays granted by the Court of Appeals on June 11, 1969, and June 19, 1969, of the injunctions of the District Court, presented to Mr. Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, is denied.
The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 1539 is denied. The appeal in No. 1540 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission, 393 U. S. 83 (1968); Wilson v. Port Lavaca, 391 U. S. 352 (1968).
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gonzalez v. Automatic Emps. Credit Union, 419 U.S. 90 (U.S. 1974)…than probable that many of these cases, while unworthy of plenary consideration here, would benefit from the normal appellate review available to single-judge cases in the courts of appeals. See Rosado v. Wyman, 304 F. Supp. 1354, appeal dismissed, 395 U. S. 826; Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Comm’n, 284 F. Supp. 950, vacated to permit appeal to Court of Appeals, 393 U. S. 83; Crossen v. Breckenridge, 446 F. 2d 833, 837; American Commuters Assn. v. Levitt, 279 F. Supp. 40, aff’d, 405 F. 2d 1148; Hart v.…
-
MTM, Inc. v. Baxley, 420 U.S. 799 (U.S. 1975)…of a constitutional claim for injunctive relief do not provide a consistent answer to this question. Compare Lynch v. Household Finance Corp., 405 U. S. 538 (1972), with Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Comm’n, 393 U. S. 83 (1968); Rosado v. Wyman, 395 U. S. 826 (1969); Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U. S. 427 (1970). See Gonzalez v. [*804] Employees Credit Union, supra, at 95 n. 11; 9 J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 110.03 [3], pp. 76-79 (2d ed. 1973). It is certain that the congressional policy behind the three-ju…
-
Rosado v. Wyman, 414 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1969)…three-judge court on the ground that the order was properly appealable to this court. The Supreme Court also refused to grant certiorari before judgment and denied appellees’ motions to expedite review and to vacate the stays ordered by this court. 395 U.S. 826, 89 S.Ct. 2134, 23 L.Ed.2d 739. Appellees thereupon appealed to this court from the order dissolving the three-judge court, and that appeal was consolidated with the appeals from the injunctions. II. We turn first to the issue raised by the appeal…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wilson v. City OF Port Lavaca, 391 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1968)
- Mengelkoch v. Indus. Welf. Comm'n, 393 U.S. 83 (U.S. 1968)