ATLAS ENGINE WORKS, INC.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cement Transp., Inc., 490 F.2d 1024 (6th Cir. 1974)
  …ing an employer’s motives from the confusion generated when spirited organizational activity clashes with comparable efforts to eliminate it.” N. L. R. B. v. Lou de Young’s Market Basket, Inc., 406 F. 2d 17, 21 (6th Cir.), remanded on other grounds, 395 U.S. 828, 89 S.Ct. 2125, 23 L.Ed.2d 737 (1969). The burden of proving an employer’s discriminatory motive in discharging an employee is on the General Counsel. N. L. R. B. v. Bangor Plastics, Inc., 392 F. 2d 772, 777 (6th Cir. 1967); Lawson Milk Co. v. N. L…
• Beazer v. NEW York City Transit Auth., 558 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …e occurred even partially for motive that violated labor laws, he has suffered a remediable wrong, even if ample valid grounds existed for his discharge); NLRB v. Pembeck Oil Corp., 404 F. 2d 105, 109 (2d Cir. 1968) (same), vacated on other grounds, 395 U.S. 828, 89 S.Ct. 2125, 23 L.Ed.2d 737 (1969). The wrong being proven, the only question remaining is how best to make the discharged employee whole for the violation of his rights. Cf. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co., 424 U.S. 747, 763-64, 96 S.Ct. 1…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Staub Cleaners, Inc., 418 F.2d 1086 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …Ed.2d 547 (1969), displayed a strong willingness to accept bargaining orders from the Board in circumstances that we would have found inappropriate in the past. See also our decision in NLRB v. Pembeck Oil Corp., 404 F. 2d 105 (2 Cir. 1968) vacated, 395 U.S. 828, 89 S.Ct. 2125, 23 L.Ed.2d 737 (1969), on [*1090] the authority of Gissel. In answering the contention that the order would be “harsh” where the union might no longer have a majority, the Court in Gissel indicated that it was for the Board, and not…