BERGER ET AL.

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Squirtco v. The Seven-Up Co., 628 F.2d 1086 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …nce of likelihood of confusion. E. g., James Bur-rough Ltd. v. Sign of Beefeater, Inc., 540 F. 2d 266 (7th Cir. 1976) (15%); Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. American Oil Co., 259 F.Supp. 559 (E.D.Mo.1966), aff’d, 405 F. 2d 803 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 905, 89 S.Ct. 1745, 23 L.Ed.2d 218 (1969). “[I]n a trademark infringement action the kind of product, its cost and the conditions of purchase are important factors in considering whether the degree of care exercised by the purchaser can eliminate the li…
• King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Aladdin Indus., 418 F.2d 31 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …the alleged danger of confusion existed, and the point is not pressed on appeal, . While we have no occasion to consider the validity of the formulation in Sinclair Oil & Refining Co. v. American Oil Co., 405 F. 2d 803, 813 (8 Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 905, 89 S.Ct. 1745, 23 L.Ed.2d 218 (1969), as applied to the case there in hand, we regard it as imposing too severe a requirement as a general rule.…
• DAN Robbins & Assocs., Inc. v. Questor Corp., 599 F.2d 1009 (C.C.P.A. 1979)
  …gh that purchasers can rely on a mark to distinguish products emanating from different sources, and a mark need not identify a specific source. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. American Oil Co., 405 F. 2d 803, 819, 160 USPQ 289, 301 (CA8), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 905, 89 S.Ct. 1745, 23 L.Ed.2d 218 (1969); cf. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp., 167 F. 2d 484, 35 CCPA 1061, 1067-69, 488-90, 77 USPQ 364, 367-69 (1948). Whether the relevant purchasing public regards a term as a common descriptive name…