MULLER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Barker, 514 F.2d 208 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …(suggesting that even a reasonable, though mistaken, belief that coercive circumstances were present at time of pleading would not render a guilty plea constitutionally infirm), and Townes v. Peyton, 404 F. 2d 456, 461 (4th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 924, 89 S.Ct. 1778, 23 L.Ed.2d 241 (1969) (holding that a defendant’s belief that coercive circumstances were present at the time of his guilty plea must have “at least some foundation in fact” to justify vacation of his conviction). But we have no do…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Schroeder, 433 F.2d 846 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …order to strike the testi- [*849] mony and his instruction to the jury to disregard it as to all defendants, rendered any error harmless. See, United States v. Lipowitz, 401 F. 2d 591 (3rd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, sub now, Muller v. United States, 395 U.S. 924, 89 S.Ct. 1778, 23 L.Ed.2d 240 (1969). II Defendant Schroeder contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.2 We cannot agree. At the outset, we note that we are required to view the evidence and the re…
• United States v. Pappas, 445 F.2d 1194 (3d Cir. 1971)
  …event them from reaching a verdict of “guilty” on count seven through an improper consideration of the evidence pertaining to count six. Cf. United States v. Lipo [*1202] witz, 401 F. 2d 591 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Muller v. United States, 395 U. S. 924, 89 S.Ct. 1778, 23 L.Ed.2d 240 (1968); United States v. Pritchard, 417 F. 2d 327 (5th Cir. 1969); see Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731, 735, 89 S.Ct. 1420, 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969); compare Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d…