IN RE RUDISILL
IN RE RUDISILL
395 U.S. 925
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 (U.S. 1970)…624.1 (a), 1624.2(d), 1626.2 (c)(1). Cf. McKart v. United States, 395 U. S. 185, 197. 406 F. 2d 494,496. United States v. Baker, 416 F. 2d 202, 204-205; Yates v. United States, 404 F. 2d 462, 465-466, rehearing denied, 407 F. 2d 50, cert. denied, 395 U. S. 925; United States v. Smith, 291 F. Supp. 63, 67-68; United States v. Lybrand, 279 F. Supp. 74, 77-83. See 32 CFK, § 1631.7 (a). Cf. 32 CFR §§ 1642.12,1642.13.…
-
United States v. Boroski, 412 F.2d 668 (6th Cir. 1969)…d that a conviction will not be reversed on appeal for failure of proof as to the order of call, where defendant did not raise the issue at trial. Yates v. United States, 404 F. 2d 462 (1st Cir. 1968), reh. denied, 407 F. 2d 50 (1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 925, 89 S.Ct. 1781, 23 L.Ed.2d 242 (1969); United States v. Sandbank, 403 F. 2d 38, [*673] 40 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 961, 89 S.Ct. 1301, 22 L.Ed.2d 562 (1969); Greer v. United States, 378 F. 2d 931, 933 (5th Cir. 1967); Lowe v. United S…
-
United States v. Dudley, 451 F.2d 1300 (6th Cir. 1971)…e order of call regulations] is essential to the validity of an Order to Report for Induction.” United States v. Baker, 416 F. 2d 202, 204-205 (9th Cir. 1969) ; Yates v. United States, 404 F. 2d 462 (1st Cir. 1968) reh. den. 407 F. 2d 50, cert. den. 395 U.S. 925, 89 S.Ct. 1781, 23 L.Ed.2d 242 (1969); United States v. Weintraub, 429 F. 2d 658 (2d Cir. 1970) cert. den. 400 U.S. 1014, 91 S.Ct. 572, 27 L.Ed.2d 627 (1971)3; but see Schutz v. United States, 422 F. 2d 991 (5th Cir. 1970) . [*1303] Congress has, on…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence