GOOCH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Williamson, 450 F.2d 585 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …that provided by Petre, and as a result the concurrent sentences imposed would have withstood assault even if the conspiracy conviction had not. Lance v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F. 2d 698, 699, cert, denied sub nom. Gooch v. United States, 395 U.S. 945, 89 S.Ct. 2017, 23 L.Ed.2d 463. The Charge to the Jury Appellants’ second contention is that the Trial Court’s instructions permitted the jury to attribute to the defendants the acts and declarations of Adams, a non-conspirator, and that the failu…
• Am. Int'l Grp., Inc. v. Islamic Republic OF Iran, 657 F.2d 430 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …s establish that revocable permits granted with respect to other types of property do not establish an entitlement which, if taken by the government, requires compensation. In Acton v. United States, 401 F. 2d 896, 899 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 945, 89 S.Ct. 2018, 23 L.Ed.2d 463 (1969), the Ninth Circuit held that government revocation of a revocable permit to prospect for uranium on public lands was not a taking because “a license does not [*449] constitute property for which the Government i…
• Marine ONE, Inc. v. Manatee Cnty., 898 F.2d 1490 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …2, 775, 85 L.Ed. 1064 (1941) (riparian landowner’s license to erect river structures is “subordinate to the dominant power of the federal government in respect of navigation”), Acton v. United States, 401 F. 2d 896, 899 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 945, 89 S.Ct. 2018, 23 L.Ed.2d 463 (1969) (“Grazing permits create no interest or estate in public lands, only a privilege which may be withdrawn. No property rights accrue to the licensee upon revocation which are com-pensable in condemnation”), and Os…