NEES

v.

CULBERTSON

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Nakaladski, 481 F.2d 289 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …t Coco’s conversation concerned a similar criminal transaction occurring less than one year after the events charged in the indictment, we find no abuse of that discretion. See Nees v. Culbertson, 5 Cir. 1969, 406 F. 2d 621, 625, cert. denied, 1969, 395 U.S. 959, 89 S.Ct. 2098, 23 L. Ed.2d 745; Miller v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F. 2d 272, 274.9 V. THE “IMPROPER” TESTIMONY Appellants allege that the District Court erred in failing to grant their motions for mistrial based upon the following testimo…
• Hanes Corp. v. Julien Millard, 531 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …59. . See 10 C. Wright & A. Miller, supra, § 2758, at 775-76, § 2759, at 787-88 & n. 25, and cases cited; 6A J. Moore, supra, fl 5708[5], An instructive case in this regard is Cunningham Bros. Inc., v. Bail, 407 F. 2d 1165 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 959, 89 S.Ct. 2100, 23 L.Ed.2d 745 (1969), a declaratory judgment action in which the plaintiff faced a number of tort suits, some pending and some threatened, growing out of the collapse of a construction platform. Plaintiff sought a declaration that i…
• United States v. Parker, 469 F.2d 884 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …ird factor, if true, is no reason for abolishing all exceptions to the general rule, as the majority of jurisdictions in this country (including the Tenth Circuit) have declined to do. Nees v. Culbertson, 406 F. 2d 621 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 959, 89 S.Ct. 2098, 23 L.Ed.2d 745 (1969); United States v. Fisher, 377 F. 2d 285 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 845, 88 S.Ct. 93, 19 L.Ed.2d 111 (1967); United States v. Dutsch, 357 F. 2d 331 (4th Cir. 1966); Cantrell v. United States, 116 U.S.…