TONGUE
v.
UNITED STATES
TONGUE
UNITED STATES
395 U.S. 967
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333 (D.C. Cir. 1974)…and jury. See generally United States v. Addonizio, 451 F. 2d 49 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936, 92 S.Ct. 949, 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972). . See note 88, supra. See also, e. g., United States v. Aadal, 407 F. 2d 381 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 967, 89 S.Ct. 2114, 23 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969). . See note 88, supra. See generally, Note, Discovery by a Criminal Defendant of His Own Grand-Jury Testimony, 68 Colum.L.Rev. 311 (1968). . “The duty of disclosure affects not only the prosecutor, but the Gov…
-
United States v. Stein, 456 F.2d 844 (2d Cir. 1972)…tates, supra,, 352 U.S. at 361, 77 S.Ct. 481; United States v. Persico, 425 F. 2d 1375, 1385 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 869, 91 S.Ct. 102, 27 L.Ed.2d 108 (1970); United States v. Aadal, 407 F. 2d 381, 382 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 967, 89 S.Ct. 2114, 23 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969). Appellants further argue that the five-year statute of limitations, 18 U.S.C. § 3282, ran before the September 22, 1966, indictment was filed. However, at the end of September 1961 one California broker paid…