SANKS ET AL.
v.
GEORGIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1969-06-23
No. 1977
395 U.S. 974 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (U.S. 1971)
    …civil courts and particularly in this instance, to its divorce courts, by the requirement of a filing fee or other fees which effectively bar persons on relief from commencing actions therein.” 286 F. Supp. 968, 972. We noted probable jurisdiction, 395 U. S. 974 (1969). The case was heard at the 1969 Term and thereafter was [*374] set for reargument at the present Term. 399 U. S. 922 (1970). We now reverse.2 Our conclusion is that, given the basic position of the marriage relationship in this society’s hier…
  • Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790 (U.S. 1970)
    …lea was involuntary because North Carolina statutes at that time allowed a defendant to escape the possibility of a death penalty on a capital charge by pleading guilty to that charge. 2 N. C. App. 27, 162 S. E. 2d 526 (1968). We granted certiorari, 395 U. S. 974 (1969), to consider petitioner’s federal constitutional claims. For the reasons presented below, we affirm. I Parker would have us hold his guilty plea involuntary and therefore invalid for two reasons: first, because it was induced by a North Car…
  • Brown v. Dixie Herlong Chastain, 416 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1969)
    …n unlawful abdication of a constitutional duty. Cf. City of Altus, Oklahoma v. Carr, 255 F.Supp. 828 (W.D.Tex., 1966) (three-judge court). But cf. Boddie v. State of Connecticut, 286 F.Supp. 968, 973 (D.Conn., 1968) (three-judge court) cert. granted 395 U.S. 974, 89 S.Ct. 2138, 23 L.Ed.2d 763. Appellees’ final argument grounded on the principle of federalism concerns the question whether the district court could “issue an injunction compelling state court action, where the issue involved has proceeded thro…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw