SAVILLE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Serrano, 870 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …n the fact that the deposition was available and its contents presumably well known to counsel in advance of its admission, there can be little reason for such tardiness. See Saville v. United States, 400 F. 2d 397, 400 (1st Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 980, 89 S.Ct. 2137, 23 L.Ed.2d 768 (1969); Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1). See generally J. Weinstein and M. Berger, 1 Weinstein's Evidence ¶ 103[02], at 103-20-22 (1986). On the other hand, the government did not argue or otherwise point out defense counsel’s t…
• United States v. Richman, 600 F.2d 286 (1st Cir. 1979)
  …thus far justified their finding that Richman and Jackson had engaged in a conspiracy. It does not appear from the record that an objection was properly made to the first point. Saville v. United States, 400 F. 2d 397, 400 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 980, 89 S.Ct. 2137, 23 L.Ed.2d 768 (1968). We see no plain error: the court did not advise the jurors that it had concluded that a conspiracy in fact existed, but merely prepared them for the coconspirator testimony which was to follow. With regard t…
• United States v. Bamberger, 456 F.2d 1119 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …rliest possible opportunity when, by doing so he can enable the trial judge to take the most efficacious action. Holden v. United States, 388 F. 2d 240, 242-243 (1st Cir. 1968).” Saville v. United States, 400 F. 2d 397 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 980, 89 S.Ct. 2137, 23 L.Ed.2d 768 (1969). See also Good v. United States, 378 F. 2d 934 (9th Cir. 1967). Therefore, we do not reach the merits of the foundation argument. Where, as here, the considerations do not rise to constitutional dimensions, we…