CHRISMAN
v.
CALIFORNIA
CHRISMAN
CALIFORNIA
395 U.S. 985
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. DeLEO, 422 F.2d 487 (1st Cir. 1970)…d disposed of the same day: Von Cleef v. New Jersey, 395 U.S. 814, 89 S.Ct. 2051, 23 L.Ed.2d 728; Shipley v. California, 395 U.S. 818, 89 S.Ct. 2053, 23 L.Ed.2d 732; Schmear v. Gagnon, 395 U.S. 978, 89 S.Ct. 2125, 23 L.Ed.2d 767; Harris v. Illinois, 395 U.S. 985, 89 S.Ct. 2137, 23 L.Ed.2d 774; Ma-honey v. LaVallee, 395 U.S. 985, 89 S.Ct. 2137, 23 L.Ed.2d 774; Chrisman v. California, 395 U.S. 985, 89 S.Ct. 2135, 23 L.Ed.2d 774; Jamison v. United States, 395 U.S. 986, 89 S.Ct. 2135, 23 L.Ed.2d 774. . This di…1 / 3
-
United States v. Nasse, 432 F.2d 1293 (7th Cir. 1970)…tes (5th Cir., 1969), 416 F. 2d 91; Williams v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 418 F. 2d 159, 161; Whiteley v. Meacham (10th Cir., 1969), 416 F. 2d 36. . See Chimel, 395 U.S. at 760, 89 S.Ct. 2034. . 396 F. 2d 887, 888 (2d Cir., 1969), cert. den. 395 U.S. 985, 89 S.Ct. 2137, 23 L. Ed.2d 774 (1969). . 395 U.S. at 766, 89 S.Ct. at 2041. . The search in United States v. Franco-lino (2d Cir., 1966), 367 F. 2d 1013, cert. den., 386 U.S. 960, 87 S.Ct. 1020, 18 L.Ed.2d 110 (1967) was similar to that of Joe Da…
-
United States ex rel. Dennis M. Lundergan v. McMANN, 417 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1969)…e de [*521] manded. Compare United States v. Francolino, 367 F. 2d 1013, 1017 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 960, 87 S.Ct. 1020, 18 L.Ed.2d 110 (1967), and United States ex rel. Mahoney v. La Vallee, 396 F. 2d 887 (2 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 985, 89 S.Ct. 2137, 23 L.Ed.2d 774 (1969), with the discussion in Chimel, 395 U.S. at 764-765 and n. 10, 89 S.Ct. 2034, and the decision in Shipley v. California, 395 U.S. 818, 89 S.Ct. 2053, 23 L.Ed.2d 732 (1969). We have no need to do this since we…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence