HAGAN ET AL.

v.

REAGAN, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Jackson v. Am. Sav. Mortg. Corp. & The Resolution Tr. Corp., 924 F.2d 195 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …court remedies); Ristuccia v. Adams, 406 F. 2d 1257, 1258 (9th Cir.1969) (finding that [*199] because appellant's motion to reopen judgment had been dismissed by state supreme court, appellants had no case to remove to federal court), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 24, 24 L.Ed.2d 3 (1969). .The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern procedure in federal court after removal. Fed.R.Civ.P. 81(c). The district judge should give a dissatisfied party ten days from the removal date to file the motion. See…
• In re Meyerland Co. v. Meyerland Co., 910 F.2d 1257 (5th Cir. 1990)
  …that no case may be removed once the state appellate process has been exhausted. See Four Keys Leasing and Maintenance Corp. v. Simithis, 849 F. 2d 770 (2d Cir.1988); Ristuccia v. Adams, 406 F. 2d 1257 (9th Cir.), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1, 90 S.Ct. 24, 24 L.Ed.2d 3 (1969); Mestice v. McShea, 201 F. 2d 363 (3d Cir.1953). It is equally beyond dispute that any case may be removed prior to trial judgment, provided the other criteria for removal are met. But, as I will demonstrate, things…

Authorities Cited

• Bennett v. Mississippi, 393 U.S. 320 (U.S. 1969)
• Williams v. Va. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 320 (U.S. 1969)