IN THE MATTER OF LAMBERT STIENHANS, REVOCATION OF LICENSE, GENERAL LINES INSURANCE AGENT

Citator

Cited By

• Frank v. State, 199 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)
  …. . Cohen v. State, (Fla.1960) 125 So. 2d 560. . State v. Scarborough, (Fla.App.1965) 170 So. 2d 458. .Spataro v. State, (Fla.App.1965) 179 So. 2d 873, 876, 877. . Stanley v. State, (Ma.App.1966) 189 So. 2d 898. . O’Neil v. State, (Ma.App.1967) 194 So. 2d 40.…
• Urquhart v. State, 211 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
  …mitting them into evidence.6 In addition to violating § 901.19(1) and thereby causing the resulting search and seizure of Exhibits 1-7 to be invalid, the seizure of Exhibits 2-7 would be invalid under the authority of O’Neil v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So. 2d 40, and Prather v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So. 2d 273. Exhibits 2-7 consist of personal property re [*84] moved from the house of Mrs. Salgado as a result of the arrest. In Prather we said at page 275: “The search was unreasonable and the court erre…
• Milan E. Harding v. State, 301 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
  …, dissents with opinion. . (Fla.App.lst, 1967), 205 So. 2d 324. . (1942), 151 Fla. 634, 10 So. 2d 361. . (1927), 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534. . (Fla.1969), 224 So. 2d 296. . (Fla.1957), 92 So. 2d 819. . (Fla.1968), 206 So. 2d 377. . (Fla.App.3d, 1967), 194 So. 2d 40. . (Fla.App.lst, 1966), 189 So. 2d 898. . (Fla.App.2d, 1966), 182 So. 2d 273, 275. . (Fla.App.2d, 1971), 256 So. 2d 32. . U.S.Const. amend. IV and Ma.Const. art. I, § 12. . See, Taglavore v. United States (9th Cir. 1961), 291 F. 2d 262. Also, cf…