HIYANE ET AL.
v.
HOUSE OF VISION, INC.

U.S. | 1969-10-13
No. 320
396 U.S. 8 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Tryforos v. Icarian Dev. Co., 518 F.2d 1258 (7th Cir. 1975)
    …ly equitable grounds. 177 F. 2d at 818, quoting Patterson v. Northern Trust Co., 286 Ill. 564, 568, 122 N.E. 55, 57 (1919). See also House of Vision, Inc. v. Hiyane, 42 Ill.2d 45, 61-62, 245 N.E. 2d 468, 472 (1969), appeal dismissed & cert. denied, 396 U.S. 8, 90 S.Ct. 26, 24 L.Ed.2d 8. The only Illinois statutory authorization for the award of attorneys’ fees that is arguably relevant is § 41 of the Civil Practice Act, Ill.Rev.Stat.1973, ch. 110, § 41: Allegations and denials, made without reasonable…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw