O'LEARY ET AL.
v.
KENTUCKY

U.S. | 1969-11-17
No. 526
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
396 U.S. 40 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rev. Robert Hunter v. Allen, 422 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir. 1970)
    …on in the law. See, for instance the federal robbery statute (18 U.S.C. § 2113) which uses the words “by intimidation” — intimidation is nothing more than a subjective state of fear. See, also, O’Leary v. Kentucky, Ky., 441 S.W. 2d 150, cert. denied 396 U.S. 40, 90 S.Ct. 267, 24 L.Ed.2d 208 (November 17, 1969). Affirmed. ** In part this is the opinion of the Court and in part a dissent, as explained below. . The plaintiffs’ appeal is limited to five of the subsections upheld as valid by the district co…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw