SANCHEZ

v.

NEW MEXICO

Citator

Cited By

• Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1981)
  …ally declared to be the limits of the [Fourteenth [A]mendment,” 612 F. 2d, at 98, this Court has never found that the involuntarily committed have a constitutional “right to treatment,” much less the voluntarily committed. See Sanchez v. New Mexico, 396 U. S. 276 (1970), dismissing for want of substantial federal question, 80 N. M. 438, 457 P. 2d 370 (1968); O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U. S. 563, 587-589 (1975) (BuRger, C. J., concurring). Thus, the Pennhurst petitioners and several amici argue that legislat…
• Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp., 612 F.2d 84 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …s already rejected the contention that Shelton’s less-drastic-means analysis applies to the conditions of civil commitment. See State v. Sanchez, 80 N.M. 438, 457 P. 2d 370 (1968) (mentally ill), dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 396 U.S. 276, 90 S.Ct. 588, 24 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970). See generally Mandel v. Bradley, 432 U.S. 173, 97 S.Ct. 2238, 53 L.Ed.2d 199 (1977) (per curiam); Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 95 S.Ct. 2281, 45 L.Ed.2d 223 (1975); Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospi…
• Romeo v. Youngberg, 644 F.2d 147 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …erance” standard in commitment proceedings, might well be furthered by employment of the least intrusive standard. . It would not appear that the Supreme Court’s summary dismissal for want of a substantial federal question in Sanchez v. New Mexico, 396 U.S. 276, 90 S.Ct. 588, 24 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970), dismissing appeal from State v. Sanchez, 800 N.M. 438, 457 P. 2d 370 (1969), which held that an admittedly dangerous patient did not have a right to the least restrictive environment, forecloses inquiry into the…